Comparing Breastmilk Preservation Recipes

Here is a good example of three breastmilk preservation method recipes. Images are taken in natural light with a DSLR on Manual mode.

In the cup, I have the same batch of breastmilk used for the experiment so you can compare the examples of methods WITH the actual milk. The top image is after it has dried (you can see it preserved on my other blogs or YouTube), and the bottom is after is has been crushed.

Here we have my method on the left. It doesn't make nearly the amount the other two do, but remember, it also doesn't have nearly the filler "substances." Also, take note, that my method is not meant to be dried out, I did so for the sake of keeping the experiment fair. (You can also see my method in the wet form as it is used via a previous post.)

The second, towards the bottom, is the CA method. You can read more about this method in previous posts.

Lastly, the famous MM breastmilk preservation powder recipe on the right. You can read more about this method in a previous post as well. - As you see, it retains the least amount of actual breastmilk color out of the methods shown. I still don't understand why this became the "go-to" recipe for breastmilk preservation. It CLEARLY has pigment in it. It made it big because the lady who started creating it didn’t tell the whole truth or the full result of the method, and didn’t care while the people in her group blindly followed.

This is why you should ask what method your DNA artist is using, and ask them to show you the method of preservation with water. This way, you can make an informed choice about your keepsake, asking this gives you a great idea as to how much your milk will actually be coloring your piece. While they don’t owe you their recipe, if they don’t want to tell you ANYTHING, that is a big red flag.

Famous powder/dust, the CA method, my method (dried), and the actual milk used for this experiment.

Proving there is Breastmilk in your jewelry

Ok, for the first real content blog on the page, today I am going to cover the newest “fad” in breastmilk jewelry. Testing to see if milk is really in your piece.

I am in a few groups for DNA artists and it's usually a battle to get anyone to understand where you are coming from when trying to chat about certain methods unless you agree with them. -Anyway, people are against my outlook on the powder method and it stirred the theoretical pot. In that whirlwind, I was also removed from a group and another artists started to claim she could tell what pieces have milk or tints. - I just felt compelled to test her claim. I’d happily send her a piece in exchange for one of hers.- I’m that confident in my own method.

I decided to set out the very next day with my own trial on her experiment because I can’t call it junk or deem it worthy if I have no first-hand knowledge with it. I like Science and am always up for a good challenge and experiment to take part in. This is how we learn and how we improve.

**** Before I go on further I am going to say this, PLEASE DO NOT EVER DO THIS IN YOUR HOME- IN YOUR OVEN-AROUND YOUR KIDS AND PETS-EVER! EVER! I am using a craft oven in my open garage and also am using PPE as this is a NASTY, NASTY, dangerous thing to be doing. (And quite irresponsible of the artist to tell people to do in their homes, not giving any sort of disclaimer and saying it is up to the client to know.) Sorry, but most people who don’t work with resin likely wouldn’t know any better. - That’s why disclaimers are put on all types of things; to be informative. Any DNA artist knows most people have 0 knowledge how dangerous it could be via that guidance.) Don’t do it!****

If you find the tik toc video, they look to be using a standard oven and does not seem to tell viewers how dangerous it is. That video should have been started 100% with a disclaimer, not only for the fumes, but also the pans and oven you are told to use. BIG NO! You HAVE to care about your clients and just others in general. This could literally KILL people with severe asthma or certain sensitive pets, like birds and reptiles. I am here to tell you DO NOT DO THIS EXPERIMENT! If you must see, please ask your artist to do it for you via a video or images. - If you cannot trust your artist beyond that you probably shouldn't be ordering from them. Truthfully, if you tell me you need an extra gem, at no charge- to bake, it's unlikely I am going to give you one. I only give extra pieces when I have extra pour, it's not always typical. What you do with any extra is your business, but I don't advise wasting it on something like this when I have already done it.

So, why am I posting this? Because a lot of the artists/groups want to censor what is out there. IT IS ALREADY OUT THERE SO TALK ABOUT IT! SCREAM ABOUT HOW TO DO IT SAFELY! OR WHY NOT TO AT ALL! DON’T CENSOR IT AND PUT IT UNDER THE RUG! Censoring doesn’t make it vanish, it only keeps information that would have been useful and safe at bay. Good thing for me I have my own platform and an IQ enough to know that it is already public. I will take it upon myself to make sure it is posted how to do so properly. - The method is out there, so it may as well be talked about for what it is AND for how to properly do it, right? It's only going to gain popularity. - This was not the first artist to have a similar claim, just the first one to take it public. Better to have GOOD, ACCURATE info about it than sweeping it under the rug like some would prefer to do. I was happy a handful of other artists did reach out via messenger in support of both the baking method being brought to light AND my points with the powder methods. You don’t have to fully agree with someone to have a discussion. Open minds create the future.

Again, do NOT do this without ALL precautions as it could cause severe allergic reactions for weeks or months at a time.
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Ok, here's the deal. Another artist released a method to prove or discredit other artists milk purity (or use) of milk in their jewelry. I felt compelled to try it as she had just removed me from her group for speaking up about the powder method. My factual information was censored and I was removed. I don’t feel quite as offended knowing that seems to be a common trend over disagreements. A lot of the artists don't think my wet method is even possible, though I assure you, with the right Science, it is. :)

With this “proof” method, you supposedly can bake your breastmilk pieces in a oven, at high temps for a few minutes and then you have your result. If your pieces brown, there is milk. If they stay white they were packed with filler and or tints.

For my first attempt at trialing this method it DID work for my preservation method. My raw breastmilk pieces turned brown and the decoy tinted piece stayed fairly white. With that said, the piece with 0% milk did change a tiny bit, but was more of a marbled look, not a uniform brown, like the others. Also, the pieces made with shimmer and or flecks didn't get AS brown as the raw milk pieces. If nothing else, this further proves my points about the powder method NOT being so tried and true (“pure”) after all. - IT IS MOSTLY FILLER and DOES have tints. I would ADORE to see some trials of this done with the famous dusts/powders. - I have a hunch that's why my post was removed. No one wants this gaining traction, not just for health risk, but for being afraid of their own methods stacking up. Maybe that’s my opinion, but it seems fishy to me.

Bottom line, I am willing to do what I can to prove my method contains milk because it does and I feel it is one of the most pure methods out there right now. I do what I can, when I can, but I don't recommend trying this on your own. If you want to see it, have your artist show you. They SHOULD be willing to as they can do it once and document their results. One and done and counter top ovens are a dime a dozen at a thrift shop or marketplace.

There are still flaws with this method proving or discrediting other artists. Too many variables go into why it does or doesn't work with methods. I'd love to see some other artists (properly protected) doing their preservation method with baking. We definitely need more artists to take part before it could be deemed 100% a way to tell. Because how do we know it would work with every method or add-in? What about age of the piece? If the piece is sealed?(which all of my set gems are, the ones I baked were not as they weren't set.) SO many things could go into why a piece does or doesn’t change. I’d like to see a controlled experiment with a bunch of artists trading pieces to trial to keep it fair and non-bias.

All in all, the take away from this is. …. . It is VERY dangerous and still too new of a method to prove or discredit if it is a “tried and true” way to tell.

Please do not message me asking for the link to the video or to the powders/dusts. A simple google search has the worlds end at your finger tips.

I will do a few more tests, just to get a better understanding, and will definitely try to do so during the day/with my pro camera so the images will be better as well.

Stay safe!

The following images are from my first attempt at the method. I used my phone to photograph in my dark kitchen.
Top pearl is the decoy tinted piece. Cluster of gems: Two raw milk gems, core bead with colostrum, gems under are with shimmer and other with shimmer and opal flecks. Small gem in the right corner: opal flecks.

how to tell if there is pigment in your breastmilk piece. Breastmilk preservation powder. Pure breastmilk preservation. Not all breastmilk preservation methods are good.
how to tell if there is pigment in your breastmilk piece. Breastmilk preservation powder. Pure breastmilk preservation. Not all breastmilk preservation methods are good..jpg